greens is mandatory regulation of human existence to a primitive level.

America Under the heel of Liberalism

Tom Gow- Freedom First, Book Review of Green Hell by Steve Milloy

living green is really about someone else microregulating you — downsizing your dreams and plugging each one of us into a brand new social order for which we never bargained. It’s about … having the boundaries of your life drawn by others.

“There is hardly any area of your life that the greens consider off limits to intrusion. There is almost no personal behavior of yours that they consider too trivial or sacrosanct to regulate.”

 Green Hell clearly shows, “this is how the greens themselves describe their intentions. Their words alone reveal their true intent: to curtail, to ration, to force, to deny, to compel, and to squeeze.”

Green Hell also reveals the credibility of the threat — the tremendous funding, high level support, and tactics that have been able to steamroll natural resistance and drive the green…

View original post 985 more words

Advertisements

policies from donor nations as detailed by the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA).

Upset about trivial problems in America compared to death,torture and dismemberment in countries where Islamic Sharia law prevail

obama_hillary_muslim_brotherhood.jpg 2

The Clinton Foundation has accepted millions from Middle Eastern and other foreign governments that criminalize homosexuality – but prominent gay rights groups in America have stayed silent on the apparent disconnect between Hillary Clinton’s rhetoric and the donations.

“Unquestionably, they’re not standing up for their principles,” said Human Rights Foundation President Thor Halvorssen.

The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee frequently talks about her support for the LGBT community, while ripping what she describes as discriminatory policies in the U.S.

“It’s outrageous that, in 2015, you can still be fired for being gay,” she told the Human Rights Campaign in an October 2015 speech. “You can still lose your home for being gay. You can even be denied a wedding cake for being gay.”

 

But published reports and figures provided by the Clinton Foundation on its website show the group has accepted millions from countries that prosecute and imprison gay people – and worse. The following is an overview of those contributions, as well as policies from donor nations as detailed by the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA).

Algeria: ($250,000-$500,000) Algerian law states: “Anyone guilty of a homosexual act is punishable with imprisonment.”

Brunei: ($1 million-$5 million) Brunei’s penal code states: “Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman, or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 yea

Jamaica: ($50,000-$100,000) Gay men caught having sex face up to 10 years in prison.

Kuwait: ($5 million-$10 million) Kuwaiti law states: “Consensual intercourse between men of full age (from the age of 21) shall be punishable with a term of imprisonment of up to seven years.”

Oman: ($1 million-$5 million) Law states: “Anyone who commits erotic acts with a person of the same sex shall be sentenced to imprisonment from six months to three years.”

Qatar: ($1 million-$5 million) Sentences for acts of homosexuality range from one to seven years in prison.

Saudi Arabia: ($10 million-$25 million) Islamic law in Saudi Arabia enforces penalties for homosexual sex, ranging from public flogging to death. For a non-Muslim who commits sodomy with a Muslim, the penalty is death by stoning.

United Arab Emirates: ($1 million-$5 million) Emirati law states: “All sexual acts outside of heterosexual marriage are banned in the United Arab Emirates.”

The Clinton Foundation probably should have to give the money back because they shouldn’t take money from these totalitarian countries that punish and torture and execute gay people for being gay,” said Matthew Vadum, vice president of the Capital Research Center, which analyzed donations to the Clinton Foundation.

But the outrage elsewhere is muted.

Fox News contacted more than a half-dozen prominent gay rights organizations including The Human Rights Campaign; GLAAD; the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission; the Los Angeles LGBT Center; and the Gill Foundation. None would comment on what critics consider Clinton’s hypocrisy, promising to protect gay rights while enriching her foundation by promoting ties with repressive governments that violate those rights.

hillary bow

 

Halvorssen said these governments are “essentially buying their way into the good graces of someone who could be the next president” and underscored the disconnect with Clinton’s message on the campaign trail.

where are the human rights

 

“The Clintons constantly talk about how they are friends and allies of the gay community, yet here they are receiving tens of millions of dollars from governments that actually execute people for being gay,” he said.

Halvorssen said Clinton should return the money.

Foundation representatives did not return calls or emails asking if the organization had any future plans to decline contributions from regimes that repress gay rights.

“It doesn’t make any sense to me and I think people are starting to realize it’s internally contradictory,” Vadum said. “The hypocrisy lies in the fact that Hillary Clinton’s foundation takes money from countries where gay sexual acts can be punished by death or by flogging or by other nasty punishments.

And so it doesn’t make a lot of sense to get Upset about trivial problems in America compared to death,torture and dismemberment in countries where Islamic Sharia law prevail

Case in point, recall the backlash Clinton received for appreciating Nancy Reagan’s “low-key advocacy” on HIV/AIDS, saying “it penetrated the public conscience, and people began to say, ‘Hey, we have to do something about this.’”

Try to convince the gay and lesbian community that, if Hillarycare hadn’t failed, most of them would be spending their final days in an isolated AIDS sanatorium somewhere in the Badlands.

And the blue-haired seniors in Florida and Arizona may find that their next flare-up of irritable bowel syndrome, or their next broken hip, might land them in a terminal care unit of their local hospital where those who linger while dying go to die, instead of sitting around bragging about their latest hospital adventure at the assisted living center.

https://seniorcitizenspublicsquare.com/2012/11/29/hillary-and-obamas-frightening-thoughts-on-our-healthcare/

Hillary Saudies 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 hypocrites who have milked the system 4 personal gain and done nothing for us.

Clinton is the walking, talking definition of a political prostitute, completely controlled by special interests.

CkrQYDmUYAAYIot Since the beginning of 2013, Clinton has received at least $21.7 million for 92 speeches she has given to private organizations and groups. This includes $225,000 from Morgan Stanley; $225,000 from Deutsche Bank; $225,000 from Bank of America; and $675,000 from the Goldman Sachs Group (for three separate speeches). George Soros, the investor, billionaire and regime change extraordinaire, has also put millions into Clinton’s campaign.

Hillary Clinton is a bought-and-paid-for representative of the big banks, the military-security complex, . She will represent these interests, not those of the American people

CFR Hillary In 2009, she revealed her relationship with the Council on Foreign Relations when she addressed the council at their newly opened outpost in Washington D.C.:

“I have been often to the mother ship in New York City, but it’s good to have an outpost of the council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.”

STEVENS2 what difference does it make hillary

War Criminal in Chief

Hillary is complicit in numerous crimes and atrocities perpetuated by the US when she was Secretary of State from January, 2009 to February, 2013. One of the most notable examples of this was the belligerent war in Libya in 2011. Clinton played a pivotal role in the NATO intervention which led to the toppling of the Libyan leader, Muammar al- Qaddafi, the destabilization of the country and the exacerbation of “humanitarian suffering.”

Arming Al-Qaeda

Clinton was also the Secretary of State during the 2012 Benghazi attack, when militants attacked a US compound in Benghazi, Libya, and a CIA facility nearby, killing four US personnel, including US Ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens. The failure to protect the compound has been widely written about, but the real story is what the compound was actually involved in. Numerous journalists – including Seymour Hersh – have reported that the compound was a key outpost for a covert operation that involved shipping weapons from Libya to the Syrian rebels who were fighting against Bashar al-Assad. Many reports have accused the US and their allies of covertly sending heavy weapons from the North African country to Syria.

“Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s, and 125 mm and 155mm howitzers missiles… The numbers for each weapon were estimated to be: 500 Sniper rifles, 100 RPG launchers with 300 total rounds, and approximately 400 howitzers missiles [200 ea – 125mm and 200ea – 155 mm]” (DIA Doc).

Clinton was a strong supporter of the ludicrous and nefarious strategy of arming the Syrian rebels, even though military intelligence was reporting in August 2012 that: “The Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI [(al-Qaeda in Iraq)], are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria.” In 2015, Clinton also called for the creation of a no-fly zone in Syria, which as we saw in Libya, would result in the US bombing the Syrian army in a bid to oust al-Assad.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Pgs.-1-3-2-3-from-JW-v-DOD-and-State-14-812-DOD-Release-2015-04-10-final-version1.pdf

Historians of the 2011 NATO war in Libya will be sure to notice a few of the truly explosive confirmations contained in theHillary emails: admissions of rebel war crimes, special ops trainers inside Libya from nearly the start of protests, Al Qaeda embedded in the U.S. backed opposition, Western nations jockeying for access to Libyan oil,

hillary clinton you are not welcome in Egypt no-obama-egypt-flag

She pushed the Obama regime into the destruction of a stable and largely cooperative government in Libya . She urged her husband to bomb Yugoslavia. She pushed for “regime change” in Syria. She oversaw the coup that overthrew the democratically elected president of Honduras. She brought neoconservative Victoria Nuland, who arranged the coup that overthrew the democratically elected president of Ukraine, into the State Department. Hillary has called President Vladimir Putin of Russia “Hitler.”

Hillary as president guarantees war and more war.

Hillary more of the same.jpg 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die

chinese military

The following is the actual text of a speech delivered in December, 2005 by Comrade Chi Haotian –the Vice-Chairman of China’s Military Commision to top office and generals. Keep in mind that China has for many years advocated deceitful and covert warfare against its enemies. This is their Modus Operandi

“Comrades, I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.comThat was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our Party’s cause will be carried on. In answering the question, “Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war,” more than 80 per cent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations.

Today I’d like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey among our people.

My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [Taiwan, Diaoyu Islands and the Spratley Islands — and mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic theme of ‘peace and development’ had come to an end, and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for China’s next phase. I also mentioned we have a vital stake overseas.

The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese people’s attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even non combatants, they’ll naturally be doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants.

Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards war……..We wanted to know: If China’s global development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it?  The fact is, our ‘development’ refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes the whole world.

We all know that on account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the centre of the world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours.Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the centre of the world shifted to the West.

In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the center of the world civilization shift back to China? Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing made similar points in early 1980’s Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the center of world civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore,

if we refer to the 19th Century as the British Century and the 20th century as the American Century, then

the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century!! (Wild applause fills the auditorium.)

Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages. These two heritages determined that we have a stronger ability to survive than the West.

That is why the Chinese race has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined ‘not to be buried by either heaven or earth’ no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national disasters. This is our advantage, Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland.

Once its enemies aim at the mainland, the enemies would have already reached Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial things.

We must understand that the term ‘living space’ (lebenstraum) is too closely related to Nazi Germany. The reason we don’t want to discuss this too openly is to avoid the West’s association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin’s new theory, ‘Human Rights are just living rights’ we only talk about ‘living’ but not ‘space’ so as to avoid using the term ‘living space.’

TrafficJamChina

From the perspective of history,

The reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because Western countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people outside of China, so that they can develop outside of China.

Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries!

The first pressing issue facing us is living space. This is the biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of wars in history. This may change in the information age, but not fundamentally                                       Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial!

Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.

Therefore, solving the ‘issue of America’ is the key to solving all other issues.

First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the White race. We the descendants of the Chinese nation are ENTITLED to the possession of the land!!!

It is historical destiny that China and United States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight. In the long run, the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle. Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology.

We still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our country.

Only by using special means to ‘clean up’ America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. images

There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind.

We are capable of achieving our purpose of ‘cleaning up’ America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focused instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country.

Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but If the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place.

According to the computations of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion

This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who know how soon it will come, the great collapse will occur any time and more than half of the population will have to go.

It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths, But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we’d have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party.

The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for military battle. The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved. Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan, but in fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites.

Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for The birth of the new society.

Therefore war is the midwife for the birth of China’s century.”

reidchinese_jpg_w300h194 chinese military

 

Wars that the Democrats have started or gotten America involved in.

Senior Citizens Public Square

Harry Truman (Democrat) dawn of the muslim brotherhood

Black Republican http://s1.zetaboards.com/Express_Yourself/topic/4225164/1/

If you listen to the Democrats talk, you would think that they were Saints. Well I’m going to name some Wars that the Democrats have started or gotten America involved in.

1. Democrat got America in the Vietnam War.
A. Democrat President John Kennedy sent money and advisors to South Vietnam.
B. Democrat president Lyndon Johnson sent American troops into Vietnam.
C. 2 Million people died in the Vietnam war.
4. 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and another 350,000 were injured.

democrat wars  Democrat got America in the Vietnam War.

Democrats got America involved in the Korean war.
A. It was Democrat president Harry Truman that sent Americans to fight in the Korean war.
B. 33,000 Americans were killed in that war.

3. Democrats used nuclear weapons on Japan.
A. It was Democrat president Harry Truman that dropped 2 nuclear bombs on Japan killing innocent women and…

View original post 242 more words

Gallery

Remember The Health Security Act (Hillary Care)

Senior Citizens Public Square

hillary bill obama cartoonNov. 12, 1993 as the Health Security Act (Hillary Care)was in its death throes, Bill Clinton was so concerned about AIDS that , he suggested that a provision be added to the bill mandating a one-time screening for AIDS be done on all US citizens.

Clinton also proposed having the CDC require every citizen with full-blown AIDS to be confined to AIDS sanatoriums until they were no longer contagious, or until they died.

The sanatoriums were to be situated in sparsely-populated areas of the country. Upon admission, patients would be required to sign living wills with euthanasia previsions that could be triggered by proxy when their healthcare providers deemed them to be “terminal.”

The AIDS provision Clinton wanted to add to Hillarycare does not appear to be in Obamacare. However, the same federal Health Board that will be charged with the responsibility of doing the cost analysis on…

View original post 768 more words

The Establishment Is Panicked’ About Trump, But ‘Not For Us’

judge jeanie

Mitt – I’m sure you and your cronies don’t feel this, but most of us working two and three jobs think we are already in the Obama abyss. Most of us are scared about our safety and our security.

You want to prevent us from falling into a recession? We don’t believe any of you. That’s why the outsiders are so strong in both parties – while the insiders seek a brokered convention or super delegates to guarantee their positions. You’re panicked, not for us, but because you’re worried about losing power. Lobbyists, pharmaceutical companies, power brokers, lawmakers… Willing to invest in absurd pensions our children can’t pay, for your own short-term political survival.

We are sick and tired of legislators with modest means, who leave Congress multi-millionaires, whose spouses and families get all the contracts from selling the post offices to accessing insider information so they can buy property and flip it. You are so entrenched that you are willing to give Hillary Clinton the win. It doesn’t matter to you which party – crony capitalism and its paradigm will not change for the elite. Let the American people suffer along the way.

Mitt, if you’re so concerned about our country, where were you when Barack Obama lied to us – saying we could keep our healthcare and our doctor?

Where were you when the GSA wasted millions of our dollars for stupid conferences, when the military suffered as the V.A. was run like a piggy bank for corrupt employees, when the IRS went after conservative 501 c3

applicants, while the Clinton Foundation runs one of the biggest 501 c3s in the world – which strikes me as a money laundering organized criminal enterprise, parading as nothing more than a shell to pay campaigners and Clinton operatives to secure her election.

And you say you’re offended by Donald Trump’s language. Politicians have been trashing each other since the founding fathers. Language so horrible I can’t even repeat on the air. You’re so offended by Trump’s language, but not Barack Obama’s condemnation of those who cling to God and guns.

And you’re worried about Donald Trump’s businesses? You, Mitt, were a corporate raider who threw people out of work and sent jobs out of the country. And you don’t like Donald’s temperament and judgment? You couldn’t even stand up to CNN’s Candy Crowley. You couldn’t even get elected when the nation was ripe for a Republican president.

70 foreign policy security experts say: Mr. Trump’s own statements lead us to conclude that as president he would use the authority of his office to act in ways that would make America less safe and diminish our standing in the world.”

Are those bozos talking about Barack Obama? And they go on to say that

that he poses a distinct threat to civil liberties in the United States. Really? I’m worried about the civil liberties of Americans who’ve had their heads cut off. And those killed in workplace violence. Did you criticize that? No.

You want us to vote for Rubio. Why? What has he done? Aside from having one of the largest absentee voting records in the history of the U.S. Senate?

And you complain about Trump University? Mitt, mind explaining your connection to Full Sail University, which knew how to quote “hold down the cost of their education” – when, in truth, it was one of the most expensive colleges in America? When the owners were top donors to you through Solamere Capital – remember? You were an original investor there. And how about Vandertott College – where Ferguson’s Michael Brown was about to attend and where your pals were about to cash his federal financial loan?

Your namby-pamby reason that you won’t support Donald Trump even if he’s the party’s nominee? You worry what you’ll tell your grandchildren when they ask why you didn’t stop Donald Trump. Maybe you ought to worry about when they ask about your loss to Barack Obama. What will you tell them? That you choked?

And I don’t care if he supported Democrats, Republicans, or Martians. He was a businessman. And I don’t care if he said Putin was a strong leader he could get along with. Hell, Hillary Clinton hit a reset button with Russia. And you’re worried about Putin when Barack Obama dances with the devil in Iran? Mitt, I never knew you were such a patriot.

You say Donald’s arrogant – he says things that you don’t. But things that you think. Your acts are more arrogant than his words.

Mitt, you lost your own state – Massachusetts – which was the second worst home state loss in presidential election history.

And Trump won 49% of Massachusetts. Donald Trump is bringing in record numbers of Americans. He is doing more to add to our ranks than any of your anemic get-out-the-vote operations.

Yes, there’s an insurrection coming. We are fed up, we’re sick of the lies, the veils and the games.

You talk about immigration, yet no one has done anything since the last amnesty in 1986. While we continue to pay for education medication and housing. While families like Kate Steinle’s – murdered by an illegal deported five times, convicted 7 times – suffer.

And behind back-door budget hearings, you continue to fund sanctuary cities that thumb their noses at American victims.

You talk about overspending and the government and the deficit has only gotten bigger. You take our money in the form of taxes, waste it away while you feather your own nests. From Bob Dole to John McCain to you, Mitt, and almost another Bush, the party elite cannot win.

Don’t be small, Mitt. Remember our history when we were fed up with a monarchy? Be careful. Be very very careful. Do not disrespect the man who makes sense to us. Because when you disrespect him, you disrespect the will of the American people. That’s not a good place to be.

And that’s my open.